Homepage
Games
News
News βΎ
All
Transfers
Drama
Business
Sponsors
Mergers
Investors
Hires
Companies
More
People
Tournaments
Brands
Brands βΎ
Companies
Organizations
Sponsors
Other
Locations
Search
Editing
News/Google Rejects Epic's Demands
From TwogPedia
News/Google Rejects Epic's Demands
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{News |seo_title=Google Rejects Epic's Demands |seo_keywords=Google |image=Google epic.png |tags=Google, Epic Games |date=2024-05-03T20:04:49.000Z |sources={{NewsSource |source=Games Industry |url=https://www.gamesindustry.biz/google-objects-to-epics-proposed-changes-to-play-store-policy |article=News/Google Rejects Epic's Demands }} |author=Andura |category=Business |content=[[Companies/Google|Google]] has strongly opposed [[Companies/Epic Games|Epic Games]]' request for an injunction aimed at Google's grip on the Android app in-app payment sectors. Google stated that Epic's proposal seeks to establish an extensive regulatory framework, giving the court unprecedented oversight over a vast and intricate ecosystem used by billions worldwide. Google rejected Epic Games' request. Google officials stated '''"Rather than a judicial injunction against alleged violations of law, Epic asks this Court to create a new global regulatory regime that would set prices, impose ongoing duties to deal, and require the Court to micromanage on an ongoing basis a highly complex and dynamic ecosystem that is used by billions of consumers and millions of app developers and that supports the business of hundreds of OEMs and carriers around the world."''' [[News/Epic Games Wins Against Google|Following Epic's prior legal victory against Google]], where a jury found Google guilty of anticompetitive behavior in both app distribution and billing. Google argues that Epic's suggested measures, such as mandating the distribution of other app stores and limiting Google's negotiation freedom, would be overly restrictive. Moreover, Google asserts that its $700m settlement with US states, reached shortly after Epic's trial win, already addresses similar concerns, rendering Epic's proposed injunction unnecessary. Google also claimed Epic's proposal will have consequences against the entire industry. Google officials stated '''"Epic's demands would harm the privacy, security, and overall experience of consumers, developers, and device manufacturers."''' Epic Games officials argued that '''"Google has a history of malicious compliance and has attempted to circumvent legislation and regulation meant to reign [sic] in their anti-competitive control over Android devices. Our proposed injunction seeks to block Google from repeating past bad-faith tactics and open up Android devices to competition and choice for all developers and consumers."''' A hearing on the proposal of Epic Games has been scheduled for Thursday, May 23. The ongoing battle between companies stems from the original Fortnite hotfix that enabled Epic Games to take direct payments for virtual currency circumventing Google's 30% commission fee. }}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to TwogPedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
TwogPedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:News
(
edit
)
Template:NewsArticle.css
(
edit
)
Template:NewsNav
(
edit
)
Template:NewsSource
(
edit
)
Template:RelatedNews
(
edit
)
Module:Arguments
(
edit
)
Module:NewsSource
(
edit
)
Module:RelatedNews
(
edit
)
Module:SocialShare
(
edit
)
Scraped:
No categories
Edit