Epic Games VS Apple. Again

Epic Games VS Apple. Again

Drama

28 September 2023 14:12

Epic Games is on a warpath against Apple once again. The petition before the Supreme Court seeks a ruling on more extensive antitrust issues regulated by the Sherman Act. Per GamesBeat Epic Games is asking,

If a “less-restrictive alternative” must be free from costs to Apple. If a “less-restrictive alternative” doesn’t exist, is the restraint invalid, if the harm to competition substantially outweighs the restraint’s procompetitive justification.

Epic contends that limitations on business practices, which yield both positive and negative competitive outcomes, are illegal if there exists a "less-restrictive alternative" capable of delivering similar advantages while causing less harm to competition.

Tags: Epic Games Apple

Share:

Sources:

Report mistake Submit news

Related news

View All

Epic Games Reveals Webshop for Devs

Just a day after its significant legal victory over Apple, Epic Games has announced a new set of features...

Business

May 02, 2025

US Court Forces Injunction on Apple

In a major development in the ongoing legal battle between Epic Games and Apple, a U.S. federal court has...

Drama

May 01, 2025

Ninja Not Happy with Epic Games

Popular streamer Ninja has criticized Epic Games for what he perceives as unfair treatment compared to other content creators...

Drama

Feb 18, 2025

Epic Games Partners with Telefónica

Epic Games has partnered with Telefónica to pre-install the Epic Games Store and Fortnite on compatible Android devices within...

Business

Dec 12, 2024

FTC Starts Issuing Refunds to Fortnite Players

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has started sending out refund checks to U.S. consumers who were tricked into making unwanted...

Drama

Dec 11, 2024

Epic Games VS Apple. Again

Drama

28 September 2023 14:12

Tags: Epic Games Apple

Epic Games is on a warpath against Apple once again. The petition before the Supreme Court seeks a ruling on more extensive antitrust issues regulated by the Sherman Act. Per GamesBeat Epic Games is asking,

If a “less-restrictive alternative” must be free from costs to Apple. If a “less-restrictive alternative” doesn’t exist, is the restraint invalid, if the harm to competition substantially outweighs the restraint’s procompetitive justification.

Epic contends that limitations on business practices, which yield both positive and negative competitive outcomes, are illegal if there exists a "less-restrictive alternative" capable of delivering similar advantages while causing less harm to competition.

Share:

Sources:

Report mistake Submit news

Related news

View All

Epic Games Reveals Webshop for Devs

Just a day after its significant legal victory over Apple, Epic Games has announced a new set of features...

Business

May 02, 2025

US Court Forces Injunction on Apple

In a major development in the ongoing legal battle between Epic Games and Apple, a U.S. federal court has...

Drama

May 01, 2025

Ninja Not Happy with Epic Games

Popular streamer Ninja has criticized Epic Games for what he perceives as unfair treatment compared to other content creators...

Drama

Feb 18, 2025

Epic Games Partners with Telefónica

Epic Games has partnered with Telefónica to pre-install the Epic Games Store and Fortnite on compatible Android devices within...

Business

Dec 12, 2024

FTC Starts Issuing Refunds to Fortnite Players

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has started sending out refund checks to U.S. consumers who were tricked into making unwanted...

Drama

Dec 11, 2024