Epic vs Apple Appeals Rejected

From TwogPedia
News/Epic vs Apple Appeals Rejected /
Revision as of 18:19, 17 January 2024 by Andura (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{News |seo_title=Epic vs Apple Appeals Rejected |seo_keywords=Epic Games |image=Epic Games.PNG |tags=Epic Games |date=2024-01-17T16:58:50.000Z |sources={{NewsSource |source=Games Industry |url=https://www.gamesindustry.biz/supreme-court-rejects-epic-vs-apple-appeals |article=News/Epic vs Apple Appeals Rejected }} |author=Andura |category=Business |content=The US Supreme Court has declined appeals from both Epic Games and Apple, upholding the ori...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Epic Games.PNG
Epic vs Apple Appeals Rejected

Business

17 January 2024 16:58

The US Supreme Court has declined appeals from both Epic Games and Apple, upholding the original antitrust trial ruling from 2021. The court order, was a victory for Apple, as most of Epic's claims were denied. The only count upheld is related to Apple's anti-steering practices, requiring them to cease preventing developers from linking to direct payment options without a 30% fee. In the previous month, the jury concluded that Google is maintaining an unlawful monopoly concerning Android, specifically in mandating developers to utilize its Play store's payment system for all transactions, accompanied by a 30% fee.

Share:Twitter.pngFacebook.pngInstagram.pngLinkedin.png
Sources:
Games Industry.png
Report mistake   Report-mistake-icon.png
Submit news   Submit-news-icon.png


Epic Games.PNG
Epic vs Apple Appeals Rejected

Business

17 January 2024 16:58

The US Supreme Court has declined appeals from both Epic Games and Apple, upholding the original antitrust trial ruling from 2021. The court order, was a victory for Apple, as most of Epic's claims were denied. The only count upheld is related to Apple's anti-steering practices, requiring them to cease preventing developers from linking to direct payment options without a 30% fee. In the previous month, the jury concluded that Google is maintaining an unlawful monopoly concerning Android, specifically in mandating developers to utilize its Play store's payment system for all transactions, accompanied by a 30% fee.

Share:Twitter.pngFacebook.pngInstagram.pngLinkedin.png
Sources:
Games Industry.png
Report mistake   Report-mistake-icon.png
Submit news   Submit-news-icon.png

Scraped: